IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-740061.html

Right Back at You: How Reciprocal Compliments Affect Interpersonal Impressions

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Zhou
  • Michelle E. Daniels
  • Adriana Samper

Abstract

While pragmatics researchers posit that the more preferred response to a compliment is a simple “thank you” over alternatives like giving a reciprocal compliment or sharing information on the complimented item, little research has examined the interpersonal consequences of compliment response strategies. In four preregistered experiments, we find that despite being perceived as less honest, a reciprocal compliment enhances impressions of the respondent more than the oft-recommended “thank you.” This effect occurs because a reciprocal compliment, relative to simple appreciation (i.e., “thank you”), signals rapport, enhancing interpersonal impressions. While reciprocal compliments are perceived as less honest, which has a negative effect on impressions, the benefit of building rapport outweighs this penalty. Beyond impressions, reciprocal compliments also promote positive word of mouth and increase satisfaction in service settings. This effect is amplified when the recipient is experiencing social isolation. Importantly, this effect reverses when the reciprocal compliment leads to social harm.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Zhou & Michelle E. Daniels & Adriana Samper, 2026. "Right Back at You: How Reciprocal Compliments Affect Interpersonal Impressions," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(2), pages 158-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/740061
    DOI: 10.1086/740061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740061
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740061
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/740061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/740061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.