IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-740059.html

What Leads to Longer Word of Mouth Discussion?

Author

Listed:
  • Reihane Boghrati
  • Jonah Berger

Abstract

While a great deal of research has demonstrated word of mouth’s impact, less is known about the broader discussions in which such sharing takes place. Some things are talked about for longer, and longer discussion tends to increase persuasion, but how might the language consumers use to talk about something shape discussion length? Natural language processing of hundreds of conversations begins to address this question. Results indicate that discussions last longer when conversation partners speak more concretely and asking narrow (but not broad) questions. These results hold even controlling for who is talking, what they are talking about, and a variety of other aspects of the discussion. Overall, the findings deepen understanding of word of mouth, shed light on linguistic drivers of conversation, and highlight how natural language processing can provide insight into consumer behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Reihane Boghrati & Jonah Berger, 2026. "What Leads to Longer Word of Mouth Discussion?," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(2), pages 171-182.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/740059
    DOI: 10.1086/740059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740059
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740059
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/740059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/740059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.