IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-738981.html

The Collaborative Edge: Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Dynamic Societal Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Hutton

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder partnerships comprising diverse stakeholders working across sectors to address a single and profound societal issue have received limited theoretical and empirical attention in consumer research. Integrating perspectives from partnering literature and social psychology, this article introduces a new exploratory concept in order to surface how stakeholders characterize and enact collaboration for enriched impact. Dynamic societal impact is the collaborative processes and actionable outcomes of multi-stakeholder partnerships addressing and solving a societal problem across community contexts. Empirical insights from a series of in-depth interviews with members of the Access to Good Food network, a complex food resilience collaboration, demonstrate how multi-stakeholder partnering is shaped through five integrated phenomena: (i) community clustering, (ii) correlation of resources, (iii) coalition of willing, (iv) collective advantage, and (v) cultivating diversity. Applying the lens of dynamic societal impact, this study contributes original theoretical and practical understandings of how working toward joint purposive action develops the collaborative edge.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Hutton, 2026. "The Collaborative Edge: Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Dynamic Societal Impact," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(1), pages 65-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/738981
    DOI: 10.1086/738981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738981
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738981
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/738981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.