IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-737205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Are You Bowling Alone? Perceived Choice over Social Context Impacts Happiness from Solo Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzanna Jurewicz
  • Miranda R. Goode
  • Kirk Kristofferson

Abstract

Solo consumers are a growing marketplace presence, and businesses in the experiential consumption domain are adapting their offerings to reach them. Yet the marketing literature has surprisingly little to say about solo experiences and generally suggests that they are unappealing. Drawing on solitude research, however, we propose that previously reported differences in happiness between solo and social experiences are partially attributable to differences in the extent to which solitude (vs. togetherness) is self-chosen. Across four studies, we show that consumers view solitude as less of a choice than togetherness and that this perception negatively impacts happiness from experiences. Moreover, we find that when consumers view solitude as a choice, its negative effect on happiness is attenuated. This research qualifies previous work on the relationship between solo experiences and happiness and introduces a novel perspective of how social context may influence consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzanna Jurewicz & Miranda R. Goode & Kirk Kristofferson, 2025. "Why Are You Bowling Alone? Perceived Choice over Social Context Impacts Happiness from Solo Experiences," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 393-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/737205
    DOI: 10.1086/737205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737205
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737205
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/737205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/737205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.