IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-737204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Lose Friends and Influence No One: The Documenting Penalty in Experiential Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Freeman Wu
  • Geoffrey R. O. Durso
  • Kelly L. Haws

Abstract

People regularly document consumption experiences, taking photos and recording videos of jointly consumed live events. While prior work has shown that such behaviors can promote engagement, enjoyment, and positive memories of the experience, the current research identifies overlooked social costs that can accompany these personal benefits. We examine this documenting penalty across a series of studies, finding that documentation behavior produces an ironic discrepancy—whereas consumers feel more present and engaged when they document experiences, we show that they are nonetheless judged by others as less present in the moment. This asymmetry generates social consequences that undermine impressions and reduce others’ interest in future interactions with the documenter. Thus, while documentation can induce personal benefits during an experience, it also carries important social costs, which can then negatively impact future consumption experiences. We provide specific solutions to preserve the benefits of documenting while mitigating its potential social detriments.

Suggested Citation

  • Freeman Wu & Geoffrey R. O. Durso & Kelly L. Haws, 2025. "How to Lose Friends and Influence No One: The Documenting Penalty in Experiential Consumption," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 381-392.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/737204
    DOI: 10.1086/737204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737204
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737204
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/737204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/737204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.