IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-735026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plain English in User Terms: Spillover Effects of Enhanced Readability on Consumer Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Sokiente W. Dagogo-Jack
  • Tim R. Samples

Abstract

Disclosure is the cornerstone of the notice and choice model of digital privacy. In theory, notice and choice frameworks empower individuals to manage their privacy via autonomous decisions. In practice, digital consumers are inundated with terms of use (TOU) agreements and other legal notices. Among the most prolific texts in human history, TOUs govern privacy and digital rights at societal scale, yet are notoriously difficult to understand. To aid comprehension, some platforms provide plain language summaries of legal terms, but how such efforts spill over to influence consumer perceptions remains unclear. In five experiments that merge legal and marketing perspectives, we find that plain language TOU summaries increase perceived brand trustworthiness via subjective fluency but decrease perceived trustworthiness via objective understanding. Additionally, we demonstrate a boundary condition based on trait trust tendencies. We conclude by discussing marketing, public policy, and legal implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Sokiente W. Dagogo-Jack & Tim R. Samples, 2025. "Plain English in User Terms: Spillover Effects of Enhanced Readability on Consumer Trust," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(3), pages 316-329.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/735026
    DOI: 10.1086/735026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735026
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735026
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/735026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/735026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.