IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-735023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About?

Author

Listed:
  • Maansi Dalmia
  • Kristin Diehl

Abstract

Consumers desire privacy, but their actions often seem to conflict (privacy paradox). Prior research focused on situations where privacy-decisions are focal (e.g., choosing passwords), recommending smoothing frictions or heightening attitude salience via contextual cues to address these inconsistencies. However, in many situations (e.g., shopping), even when consumers face privacy-relevant decisions (e.g., exchanging one’s email for discounts), privacy decisions are not part of the focal task. For these situations, we propose that thoughts about privacy are crowded out by task-related thoughts, even when encountering contextual cues that should trigger privacy thoughts. Across four studies, our findings suggest that thoughts about privacy, assessed by open-ended and indirect measures, are scarce and dwarfed by thoughts about the focal task. Furthermore, contextual cues (e.g., marketer requests for information, browsing situation) alone were generally insufficient to generate spontaneous thoughts about privacy. However, in combination with close-ended measures, contextual cues generated moderate levels of privacy-related thoughts.

Suggested Citation

  • Maansi Dalmia & Kristin Diehl, 2025. "Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About?," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(3), pages 226-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/735023
    DOI: 10.1086/735023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735023
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735023
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/735023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/735023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.