IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-734834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncommonly Rare: Consumers Value Rarity in Digital Goods More in Larger Collections

Author

Listed:
  • Joy Lu
  • Robert Mislavsky
  • Haiyang Yang

Abstract

As more consumption moves to the metaverse, digital goods are becoming a substantial source of revenue for firms. Unlike their physical counterparts, digital goods have minimal supply constraints, and firms must make more deliberate decisions both on how to set the total supply of a product and how to distribute features within a product line. It is thus critical to understand how these decisions impact what consumers are willing to pay for digital goods. In an analysis of over 800,000 sales across 40 major NFT (nonfungible token) collections, we investigate how collection size and feature rarity are associated with an item’s transaction volume and average selling price. We find that, while rare items within a collection sell for more on average, this effect increases for larger collections. In addition, while NFTs in larger collections do not have lower selling prices, on average, larger collections tend to generate more sales volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Joy Lu & Robert Mislavsky & Haiyang Yang, 2025. "Uncommonly Rare: Consumers Value Rarity in Digital Goods More in Larger Collections," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(2), pages 206-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734834
    DOI: 10.1086/734834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734834
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734834
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.