IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-734654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online-Offline Self-Identity Overlap and Consumer Decision to Acquire Digital-Physical Twins in the Metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Lu
  • Xiuping Li
  • Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang

Abstract

With the blending of virtual and physical realms in the metaverse, this research investigates how acquiring a physical product influences the decision to purchase its digital counterpart and vice versa. We propose that online-offline identity overlap (OOIO) predicts consistent preferences across these realms, affecting purchase behavior. Across two pilot studies and four experiments with 1,864 participants, we find that consumers with high OOIO are more likely to acquire both versions of a product. This effect is stronger when products highlight attributes experienced reliably in both realms (e.g., visual design) and weaker for attributes limited to one world. Additionally, goal consistency moderates this effect, with divergent goals reducing acquisition consistency. For consumers with high OOIO, marketing efforts across realms can be mutually reinforcing, especially when product attributes are comparable in both digital and physical contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Lu & Xiuping Li & Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang, 2025. "Online-Offline Self-Identity Overlap and Consumer Decision to Acquire Digital-Physical Twins in the Metaverse," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(2), pages 180-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734654
    DOI: 10.1086/734654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734654
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734654
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.