IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-734652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Activism in the Metaverse: A Framework for Virtualized Protest as Playful Resistance

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew B. Edelblum
  • Markus Giesler

Abstract

Is the metaverse a worthwhile venue for collective action? While some argue the virtual world empowers marginalized actors in the democratic process, the prevailing view dismisses metaverse demonstrations as cartoonish avatars parading down 3D-rendered streets with digital flags and picket signs. Through a netnographic investigation of a start-up metaverse platform dedicated to protests, we explore how four ostensibly depoliticizing processes—gamification, dematerialization, emotionalization, and decentralization—are reimagined by an online community as tools for playful resistance and subversive digital politics. Participants recognized that virtual protests offer unique opportunities to engage and empower activists globally, foster inclusive movements, and evade institutional control. Our findings challenge assumptions about the trivialization of virtual protests, positioning the metaverse as a potential complementary setting for sustained grassroots activism. We conclude with an agenda for future research on how platform design features—including modding, interoperability, encryption, and polycentricity—can balance corporate interests with sincere collective action.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew B. Edelblum & Markus Giesler, 2025. "Consumer Activism in the Metaverse: A Framework for Virtualized Protest as Playful Resistance," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(2), pages 191-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734652
    DOI: 10.1086/734652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734652
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734652
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/734652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.