IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-727834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connecting the Past and the Present: How Narrative-Based Representations Affect Perceptions of Brand Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Nathanael S. Martin
  • Noah VanBergen
  • T. Andrew Poehlman
  • Rashmi Adaval

Abstract

Recent research shows that certain marketing strategies lead to increased perceptions of brand heritage. Yet while strategies to increase brand heritage have been identified, an empirical framework that explains how and why brand heritage perceptions are formed is needed. The present research focuses on comprehension processes and proposes that perceptions of brand heritage are formed through narrative processing—and that a key element to maintaining these perceptions is consumers’ ability to construct a single coherent mental representation of the brand’s story wherein the past can inform the present and continuity is maintained. Consistent with prior work on heritage branding, the current research shows disruptions in the brand’s life (e.g., ownership transfers or changes in product design) lead to corresponding reductions in brand heritage due to breaks in continuity. In line with theoretical models of narrative processing, this research suggests that certain types of cues might help counter narrative disruptions, whereas other cues might facilitate it.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathanael S. Martin & Noah VanBergen & T. Andrew Poehlman & Rashmi Adaval, 2024. "Connecting the Past and the Present: How Narrative-Based Representations Affect Perceptions of Brand Heritage," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(1), pages 71-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/727834
    DOI: 10.1086/727834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727834
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727834
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/727834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/727834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.