IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-726430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Knowledge Differences within Couples Predict Influence over Shared Financial Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny G. Olson
  • Scott I. Rick

Abstract

Romantic partners rarely have equal responsibility for, and equal influence over, their shared financial matters. Intuitively, one might expect the partner with greater financial knowledge to have greater influence. However, unless partners are routinely quizzing each other, they are unlikely to have a precise understanding of each other’s objective financial knowledge (OFK). We document that partner A’s understanding of partner B’s OFK is colored by partner B’s self-perceived OFK (subjective financial knowledge [SFK]). Accordingly, SFK plays an important role in financial decisions that romantic partners jointly navigate. In a survey and an incentive-compatible lab experiment (both with couples), we find that partners’ SFK differences reliably predict their relative influence over shared financial decisions. Partners’ OFK differences generally played a more modest role in those shared decisions. However, when romantic partners individually make financial decisions, OFK plays a more prominent role. Thus, SFK appears to be particularly important in interpersonal contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny G. Olson & Scott I. Rick, 2023. "Subjective Knowledge Differences within Couples Predict Influence over Shared Financial Decisions," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(4), pages 378-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/726430
    DOI: 10.1086/726430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726430
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726430
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/726430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/726430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.