IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-726424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trickle Down Spending: The Role of Income Inequality on Gift Spending Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Max Alberhasky
  • Andrew D. Gershoff

Abstract

Income inequality, or how much money one consumer earns relative to another, may affect sympathy and gift spending decisions. Earning a relatively higher-income compared to another consumer increases the amount given as a real gift for a relatively lower-income recipient (study 1). The effect is driven by heightened spending on relatively lower earners (study 2) and is mediated by situational sympathy for the lower-income recipients, leading to increased reported spending on gifts (study 3). Using the recipients’ earning effort to manipulate situational sympathy moderates gift spending, demonstrating that a higher-income consumer will not spend more on a relatively lower-income recipient who works fewer hours than the giver (study 4). Consumers are more likely to reciprocate an expensive gift from a lower- versus a higher-income earner (study 5). This research is among the first to document how a consumer’s relative income to another affects financial decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Alberhasky & Andrew D. Gershoff, 2023. "Trickle Down Spending: The Role of Income Inequality on Gift Spending Decisions," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(4), pages 441-451.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/726424
    DOI: 10.1086/726424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726424
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726424
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/726424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/726424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.