IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-725031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Prosocial Social: The Effectiveness of Social Proof for Energy Conservation Using Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Bollinger
  • Kenneth T. Gillingham
  • Kelley Gullo Wight

Abstract

Social media can be an effective tool for encouraging prosocial behavior, such as energy conservation, making it a key avenue to address the challenges associated with climate change. We examine how social media can be best leveraged to encourage energy-saving behavior. We theorize that two characteristics of social media messages are of particular importance in the context of nudging prosocial behavior: the recipient’s affiliation with the message sender and whether the content of the message contains a social proof appeal. We use a multimethod approach to test the importance of these characteristics, including a large-scale energy efficiency campaign and a controlled experiment. We find that social media messages sent by a group with which the recipient is affiliated are substantially more effective, particularly when providing evidence of social proof. We discuss the practical impact on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Bollinger & Kenneth T. Gillingham & Kelley Gullo Wight, 2023. "Making Prosocial Social: The Effectiveness of Social Proof for Energy Conservation Using Social Media," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(3), pages 290-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/725031
    DOI: 10.1086/725031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725031
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725031
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/725031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/725031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.