IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-722694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delegitimizing Racialized Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Ela Veresiu

Abstract

Despite the increased focus on racial justice in markets and society, the delegitimization of racialized brands employing racial stereotypes to enliven themselves remains unexplored. This study draws on media data and discursive (de)legitimization to compare the initial maintenance and eventual removal of a mainstream racialized brand name through public discourses in the popular press. Specifically, it unpacks how brands’ spokespeople and other professionals legitimized Gypsy Sauce in the German marketplace in 2013 only to delegitimize the controversial brand name in 2020. “Gypsy” is a racially charged and derogatory term for the self-designated Roma ethno-race. The critical discourse analysis reveals two commonly used delegitimizing discourses (antiracism and social tolerating) as direct responses to two dominant legitimizing discourses (romanticizing and market dynamicizing) for the racialized brand. This article concludes with consumer implications, branding recommendations, and future research directions on delegitimizing culturally insensitive brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Ela Veresiu, 2023. "Delegitimizing Racialized Brands," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 59-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/722694
    DOI: 10.1086/722694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722694
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722694
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/722694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/722694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.