IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-720447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baking Your Own Cookies: Does Food Self-Production Increase Consumption?

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaud Monnier
  • Sarah Lim
  • Kathryn Latour
  • Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer

Abstract

Prior research suggests that self-production leads to greater food liking and in turn increases consumption. However, empirical evidence on how self-production of food affects consumption in natural settings remains limited and looks only at situations in which food not immediately consumed is lost. The present research examines how self-production affects food consumption over the course of a day. In a series of four experiments (n=798), participants either self-produced or received cookies, and reported the number of cookies eaten at the end of the day. Contrary to prior empirical investigations, we found no evidence that self-production increases consumption when participants can conserve their production. Overall, self-producers consumed 10% less throughout the day. This finding suggests that for unhealthy foods that can be conserved for several days and shared with others, such as cookies, self-production may help reduce food intake (vs. getting the same food ready-made).

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaud Monnier & Sarah Lim & Kathryn Latour & Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer, 2022. "Baking Your Own Cookies: Does Food Self-Production Increase Consumption?," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(4), pages 501-508.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/720447
    DOI: 10.1086/720447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/720447
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/720447
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/720447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/720447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.