IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-719672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Political Identity Influences COVID-19 Risk Perception: A Model of Identity-Based Risk Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Ellie Kyung
  • Manoj Thomas
  • Aradhna Krishna

Abstract

Past research suggests that conservatives are usually more threat-sensitive than liberals are. Yet during the COVID-19 pandemic, conservatives consistently underestimated the risk from the virus. To reconcile this paradox, we introduce a model of identity-based risk perception (IRP). This model posits that risk perceptions depend not only on objective risk but also on people’s political identity and whether the risk pertains to their group identity (group risk) versus individual identity (individual risk). When asked about the group risk posed by a threat (“How many Americans will die of COVID-19?”), conservatives focus on their national pride and underestimate the risk of contracting the virus compared to liberals. However, when asked about individual risk from the same threat (“What is the probability of an individual dying of COVID-19?”), conservatives focus on individual mortality threat and overestimate the risk of succumbing to the virus compared to liberals. Three national surveys support the IRP model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellie Kyung & Manoj Thomas & Aradhna Krishna, 2022. "How Political Identity Influences COVID-19 Risk Perception: A Model of Identity-Based Risk Perception," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(3), pages 316-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719672
    DOI: 10.1086/719672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719672
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719672
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/719672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.