IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-719587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Under a Political Cloud: How Politicized Brands Shape Gift Appreciation

Author

Listed:
  • William Ding
  • Jeff Joireman
  • David E. Sprott

Abstract

Brands have increasingly taken a stance on controversial sociopolitical issues. However, our knowledge of how politicized brands impact consumers in the context of interpersonal relationships is limited. The present studies investigate how consumers respond to politicized brands that are given as gifts. To understand this phenomenon, we frame our work within a gifting space composed of the giver, receiver, and branded gift, grounded within a broader environmental context. Three studies test a causal model derived from this framework. Study 1 reveals that gift recipients show less appreciation for politically incongruent gifts that threaten their identity, an effect magnified among consumers whose political identity is central to their self-concept. Study 2 finds that when givers’ persuasion attempts are not inferred, the negative impact of political identity incongruence on gift appreciation is reduced. Finally, study 3 demonstrates that incorporating congruent symbols into identity-incongruent brands enhances gift appreciation.

Suggested Citation

  • William Ding & Jeff Joireman & David E. Sprott, 2022. "Under a Political Cloud: How Politicized Brands Shape Gift Appreciation," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(3), pages 340-349.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719587
    DOI: 10.1086/719587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719587
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719587
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/719587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.