IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-716067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring How Publics Discursively Organize as Digital Collectives: The Use of Empty and Floating Signifiers as Organizing Devices in Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Elanor Colleoni
  • Laura Illia
  • Stelios Zyglidopoulos

Abstract

Extant research has analyzed how consumers constitute online publics aggregating around a common frame. Yet previous studies do not explain how aggregative frames function discursively, and thus it is unclear how individuals aggregate despite not sharing a common identity. Drawing on Laclau’s theory on empty signifiers, we suggest that aggregative frames take the form of empty signifiers, that is, broad terms whose meaning remains open. Thanks to this emptiness, aggregative frames can be appropriated by individuals and their meaning repurposed to serve individuals’ desire for publicity, so to constitute digital collectives. Furthermore, we suggest that empty signifiers do not always form publics but only when they are associated with floating signifiers, that is, less broad terms. By disentangling the mechanism that allows publics to form, our study contributes to scholarship on digital collectives as it deepens our understanding of the conditions that are necessary for publics to form.

Suggested Citation

  • Elanor Colleoni & Laura Illia & Stelios Zyglidopoulos, 2021. "Exploring How Publics Discursively Organize as Digital Collectives: The Use of Empty and Floating Signifiers as Organizing Devices in Social Media," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(4), pages 491-502.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/716067
    DOI: 10.1086/716067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/716067
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/716067
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/716067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/716067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.