IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-710246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Promotions Are Inherently More Arousing for Interdependents

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Ng
  • Mehak Bharti
  • Kim Huat Goh

Abstract

The ubiquity of promotions and price discounts has prompted much research to understand how consumers respond to deals. In this research, we present an affective perspective for why some consumers may be more deal prone than others. Specifically, we propose that for interdependents (vs. independents), chancing upon a deal leads to heightened arousal and greater purchase intention for the discounted product. We further propose that this effect arises because interdependents (vs. independents) are more likely to possess a comparative mindset. Findings from five studies provide converging evidence to support our propositions. Across the studies, we adopt different operationalizations of self-construal (via country, cultural prime, self-construal scale and prime), measures of arousal (skin conductance and self-report measures) and use different product categories. We further show that when a comparative mindset is made salient for independents and interdependents, the observed effect dissipates.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Ng & Mehak Bharti & Kim Huat Goh, 2021. "Price Promotions Are Inherently More Arousing for Interdependents," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 67-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/710246
    DOI: 10.1086/710246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/710246
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/710246
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/710246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/710246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.