IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-709890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scarcity of Choice: The Effects of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Consumers’ Responses to Substitution

Author

Listed:
  • Debora V. Thompson
  • Ishani Banerji
  • Rebecca W. Hamilton

Abstract

Consumers’ choices are often restricted due to either product scarcity or resource scarcity, prompting consumers to seek substitutes. Yet substitution can be difficult because consumers value the ability to make choices and often react negatively when scarcity limits their ability to choose. In this article, we examine the lasting effects of childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on the ability of adult consumers to “let go” of an unattainable initial choice. We find that consumers with lower childhood SES are more likely to actively devalue an initially chosen alternative after learning that it is unavailable than consumers with higher childhood SES, and they also demonstrate higher motivation to perform subsequent tasks. These results suggest that consumers who grew up in conditions of resource scarcity (vs. abundance) may demonstrate more adaptive responses to product scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Debora V. Thompson & Ishani Banerji & Rebecca W. Hamilton, 2020. "Scarcity of Choice: The Effects of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Consumers’ Responses to Substitution," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(4), pages 415-426.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/709890
    DOI: 10.1086/709890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/709890
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/709890
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/709890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/709890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.