IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-697077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into the Experience of Brand Betrayal: From What People Say and What the Brain Reveals

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Reimann
  • Deborah J. MacInnis
  • Valerie S. Folkes
  • Arianna Uhalde
  • Gratiana Pol

Abstract

Brand betrayal is a state evoked when a brand with which one has previously established a strong self–brand connection fractures a relationship by engaging in a moral violation. We know little about whether brand betrayal is merely an extreme form of brand dissatisfaction or is a distinct state experienced differently from dissatisfaction. Herein, two studies shed new light into the experience of brand betrayal. A large-scale psychometric study shows that brand betrayal (vs. dissatisfaction) is associated with feelings of psychological loss, self-castigation over one’s prior relationship with the brand, indignation-focused versus frustration-focused anger, and rumination. A functional neuroimaging experiment further demonstrates that brand betrayal and brand dissatisfaction can be differentiated neurophysiologically, holding all else equal. These effects suggest that compared with brand dissatisfaction, brand betrayal is likely to be more harmful to both the brand and the brand relationship, and more difficult for marketers to deflect, with longer lasting consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Reimann & Deborah J. MacInnis & Valerie S. Folkes & Arianna Uhalde & Gratiana Pol, 2018. "Insights into the Experience of Brand Betrayal: From What People Say and What the Brain Reveals," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(2), pages 240-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/697077
    DOI: 10.1086/697077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697077
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697077
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/697077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/697077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.