IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-714114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does an Increasing Minimum Wage Reduce Formal Sector Employment? Evidence from Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Saltiel
  • Sergio Urzúa

Abstract

Between 2003 and 2012, Brazil’s real minimum wage increased by 62%. In this paper, we take advantage of matched employer-employee data and examine whether this increase resulted in negative impacts in the formal labor market. The empirical analysis is carried out at the local level. Our main identification strategy relies on geographical variation in the incidence of the minimum wage. We first document substantial heterogeneity in the incidence both across and within regions. We find limited overall disemployment effects but unravel larger negative employment elasticities for groups and sectors more exposed to minimum wage increases. We complement our analysis by exploiting the introduction of regional wage floors in five states directly targeting workers in the restaurant and accommodation industry. Across different empirical strategies, we show that wage floors successfully raised salaries at the bottom of the wage distribution. However, in this case, we fail to find significant impacts on employment outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Saltiel & Sergio Urzúa, 2022. "Does an Increasing Minimum Wage Reduce Formal Sector Employment? Evidence from Brazil," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(4), pages 1403-1437.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/714114
    DOI: 10.1086/714114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714114
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714114
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/714114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/714114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.