IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucm/padeur/v26y2013i1p26-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Football on TV: an empirical analysis on the italian couch potato attitudes
[Fútbol en la televisión: un análisis empírico sobre las actitudes coach potato de los italianos]

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Di Domizio

    (Researcher in Economics. Faculty of Political Sciences. University of Teramo, Italy.)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between Football and TV audience looking for empirical evidences from Italian Serie A. The analysis traces previous econometric study, based on season 2008/09, focusing on season 2009/10. Data on 380 matches played in the Italian top professional football league are collected in order to select variables suitable of influencing the share of TV audience on satellite television. We try to estimate the «Football on TV» demand by an OLS regression model introducing a set of independent variables about the match quality, the TV programming placement, the market size of teams and their rank. In addition, our attention concentrates on the relationship between the closeness of the game and the television audience, where uncertainty of outcome is modelled using information from the betting market. It emerges that many of the theoretical expected relationships are confirmed by the econometric analysis, even though some peculiarities emerge with respect to the uncertainty of outcome issue. In particular, closer contexts are important in determining the interest of sporting events, also from the Italian TV audience perspective, but they are not crucial. If the set of explanatory variables includes both the uncertainty of outcome and teams probabilities of winning, a negative relationship between the closeness of the match and TV audience emerges. This result suggests two possible explanations. First, the TV spectators behave just like stadium fans, and they are mainly interested in their own team victory. Second, the negative relationship may be attributed to the «David versus Goliath» hypothesis since neutral positioned fans watch matches on TV in the hope that little teams defeat top ranked teams. Finally, our empirical analysis confirms the decisive role of Inter, Juventus and Milan in determining the size of couch potato audience, supporting the idea of big teams' management that the competitive balance has not a great commercial appeal, and that the collective bargaining of TV rights must not be justified on this ground.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Di Domizio, 2013. "Football on TV: an empirical analysis on the italian couch potato attitudes [Fútbol en la televisión: un análisis empírico sobre las actitudes coach potato de los italianos]," Papeles de Europa, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI), vol. 26(1), pages 26-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucm:padeur:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:26-45
    DOI: 10.5209/rev_PADE.2013.n26.42799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/47697/1/2013-26-1%2826-45%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5209/rev_PADE.2013.n26.42799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Schreyer & Sascha L. Schmidt & Benno Torgler, 2018. "Game Outcome Uncertainty in the English Premier League," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 19(5), pages 625-644, June.
    2. Isabel Artero & Eduardo Bandrés, 2018. "The Broadcasting Demand for the Spanish National Soccer Team," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 19(7), pages 934-959, October.
    3. Raul Caruso & Francesco Addesa & Marco Di Domizio, 2019. "The Determinants of the TV Demand for Soccer: Empirical Evidence on Italian Serie A for the Period 2008-2015," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(1), pages 25-49, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucm:padeur:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:26-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Águeda González Abad (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feucmes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.