IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v18y2018i1p223-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the health economic agreement of different data sources

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Gallacher

    (University of Warwick)

  • Felix Achana

    (University of Warwick)

Abstract

In this article, we present a simple-to-use framework for assessing the agreement of cost-effectiveness endpoints generated from different sources of data. The aim of this package is to enable the rapid assessment of routine data for use in cost-effectiveness analyses. By quantifying the comparability of routine data with “gold-standard” trial data, we inform decisions on the suitability of routine data for cost-effectiveness analysis. The rapid identification of informative routine data will increase the opportunity for economic analyses and potentially reduce the cost and burden of collecting patient-reported data in clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Gallacher & Felix Achana, 2018. "Assessing the health economic agreement of different data sources," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 18(1), pages 223-233, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:223-233
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj18-1/st0521/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0521
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xavier Armoiry & Jean-François Obadia & Peter Auguste & Martin Connock, 2020. "Conflicting findings between the Mitra-Fr and the Coapt trials: Implications regarding the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous repair for heart failure patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitati," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Martin Connock & Peter Auguste & Xavier Armoiry, 2021. "A comparison of published time invariant Markov models with Partitioned Survival models for cost effectiveness estimation; three case studies of treatments for glioblastoma multiforme," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 89-100, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:223-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.