IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unexpected Impact of Health on the Labor Supply of the Oldest Americans




Since many workers who retire early do so because of health considerations, one would think that those who continue to work after the traditional retirement age of 65 enjoy good health. By extension, it seems obvious that the elderly who spend the most time working for pay would be in the best health. However, at a time when many in this age group rely on expensive pharmaceuticals not covered by Medicare, one important consideration is whether these individuals have some form of supplementary insurance to assist with these and other out-of-pocket medical expenses. The AHEAD (Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old) data set is used to test the hypothesis that elderly working Americans in below-average health spend more hours engaged in market work. This result is consistent with the possibility that they do so in order to gain access to employer-provided health insurance or to pay high out-of-pocket medical expenses. A labor supply analysis, performed using a multistage Heckit procedure, reveals that women are particularly vulnerable: Those in poor or only fair health, those needing assistance with one or more Activities of Daily Living, and those with higher medical expenses tend to work significantly more hours than do those in better physical condition, as do men without pensions who presumably lack retiree health benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Carole A. Green, 2006. "The Unexpected Impact of Health on the Labor Supply of the Oldest Americans," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 27(3), pages 361-379, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:361-379

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Richard B. Freeman & Edward P. Lazear, 1995. "An Economic Analysis of Works Councils," NBER Chapters,in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 27-52 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. James T. Bennett & Bruce E. Kaufman, 2001. "The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the U.S," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 22(2), pages 227-228, April.
    3. Laroche, P., 2000. "What do Unions do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis," Papers 2000-5, Groupe de recherche en économie financière et en gestion des entreprises, Universite Nancy 2.
    4. Steven G. Allen, 1985. "The Effect of Unionism on Productivity in Privately and Publicly Owned Hospitals and Nursing Homes," NBER Working Papers 1649, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Domowitz, Ian & Hubbard, R Glenn & Petersen, Bruce C, 1986. "The Intertemporal Stability of the Concentration-Margins Relationship," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 13-34, September.
    6. Addison, John T & Hirsch, Barry T, 1989. "Union Effects on Productivity, Profits, and Growth: Has the Long Run Arrived?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(1), pages 72-105, January.
    7. Macpherson, D.A. & Dunne, T., 1992. "Unionism and Gross Employment Flows," Working Papers 1992_10_5, Department of Economics, Florida State University.
    8. Richard B. Freeman, 1980. "The Exit-Voice Tradeoff in the Labor Market: Unionism, Job Tenure, Quits, and Separations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 94(4), pages 643-673.
    9. Fallick, Bruce C & Hassett, Kevin A, 1999. "Investment and Union Certification," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(3), pages 570-582, July.
    10. repec:mes:challe:v:38:y:1995:i:3:p:53-56 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Michael D. Bordo & Claudia Goldin & Eugene N. White, 1998. "The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number bord98-1, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:361-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.