IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Why Women Earn Less Than Men in Self-Employment

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    Data from a sample of 659 self-employed individuals are used to evaluate explanations for the large earnings differential between self-employed men and women. A significant portion of the differential is attributed to differences in the industrial distribution of businesses and to the differential effects of housework and family responsibilites on the earnings of males and females. Differences due to industry position are traced to the lower proportions of women in the relatively rewarding areas of construction and professional practice and their greater representation in the relatively unrewarding personal services sector. Women in self-employment appear to be burdened by housework and childrearing in ways that limit the scope of their self-employed businesses and the intensity of work effort in them. If self-employed women were to have their total hours of labor redistributed between market work and house work in the same manner as men, their self-employed earnings would be substantially increased. A portion of the differential is traceable to differences in financial capital (female-run business have smaller capital stocks) and differences in specific human capital (female self-employed have less experience in running their business).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Transaction Publishers in its journal Journal of Labor Research.

    Volume (Year): 22 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 4 (October)
    Pages: 817-829

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:22:y:2001:i:4:p:817-829
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:22:y:2001:i:4:p:817-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.