IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v23y2023i2p11-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Environmental Consensus: The Case of the World Commission on Dams

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Schulz
  • William M. Adams

Abstract

Recent discussion of global environmental assessment processes suggests that the process of consensus creation is central to understanding the way knowledge is produced and conclusions are reached. Here we contribute to this literature by providing a case study of the World Commission on Dams, which brought together supporters and opponents of large dams, at the height of controversy about dams in the 1990s. The Commission reviewed evidence and formulated guidelines for best practice, finding a way through a political stalemate. The article draws on interviews with those involved in the Commission and discusses the historical context, form of stakeholder representation, time horizon, and leadership style as consensus-enabling conditions. We conclude that an ambitious consensual process was successful within the life of the Commission, but at the cost of carrying external actors with it, leading to challenges with dissemination and uptake of consensual recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Schulz & William M. Adams, 2023. "The Politics of Environmental Consensus: The Case of the World Commission on Dams," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 23(2), pages 11-30, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:11-30
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00687
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:11-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.