IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v21y2026i4p675-698.html

Competition and Voice in Public Education: Evidence from Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Abiel Sebhatu

    (Stockholm School of Economics SE-113 83 Stockholm Sweden)

  • Karl Wennberg

    (Stockholm School of Economics SE-113 83 Stockholm Sweden)

  • Erik Lakomaa

    (Institute for Economic and Business History Research (EHFF) Stockholm School of Economics SE-113 83 Stockholm Sweden)

  • Maria Brandén

    (Institute for Analytical Sociology (IAS) Linköping University SE-601 74 Norrköping Sweden
    Department of Sociology Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm Sweden)

Abstract

While numerous studies examine the effects of school competition on student performance, little research directly addresses a key critique of competition: its potential to negatively affect parental engagement and voice. We draw on Hirschman's theory of voice to argue that voucher-based school competition increases opportunities for exit but may crowd out voice. To assess the causal effects of competition on parental voice, we use a robust two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences framework, comparing municipalities in Sweden that introduced competition with those that did not. Our findings indicate that school complaints decline following the introduction of competition. This decrease in voice is driven by neither a decrease in problems in school nor by changes in teaching staff quality or attrition. This suggests that the decrease in complaints is driven not by an increase in school quality but rather by a change in how much parents voice their concerns. These results offer new insights into the unintended consequences of school competition reforms, highlighting how market-based policies may shape school quality beyond their intended effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiel Sebhatu & Karl Wennberg & Erik Lakomaa & Maria Brandén, 2026. "Competition and Voice in Public Education: Evidence from Sweden," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 21(4), pages 675-698, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:4:p:675-698
    DOI: 10.1162/EDFP.a.439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP.a.439
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/EDFP.a.439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:4:p:675-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.