IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v21y2026i2p390-403.html

Exploring Claims of Critical Race Theory, Divisive Topics, and Indoctrination in the Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew H. Lee

    (Department of Economics Finance and Quantitative Analysis Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, GA 30144)

  • Brian Kisida

    (Truman School of Government and Public Affairs University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211)

  • J. Cameron Anglum

    (College of Education Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA 18015)

  • Heidi H. Erickson

    (Department of Educational Leadership and Foundations Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602)

  • Jennifer S. Gontram

    (School of Education Saint Louis University St. Louis, MO 63103)

  • Gary W. Ritter

    (School of Education Saint Louis University St. Louis, MO 63103)

Abstract

Critical race theory (CRT) and claims of political indoctrination in K–12 classrooms are at the forefront of the ongoing culture wars surrounding public education. Despite a wave of legislative action targeting CRT-related instruction, little systematic evidence documents the extent to which critics' claims have merit. Using a nationally representative survey of American high school students, we examine the frequency with which students are exposed to CRT-related content and political bias in their classrooms. We further examine how students' experiences differ by political preference, race/ethnicity, and local political context, finding that classroom content likely mirrors community preferences. Our findings suggest that although some divisive topics are discussed, their frequency and context do not support the claims of the most vocal critics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew H. Lee & Brian Kisida & J. Cameron Anglum & Heidi H. Erickson & Jennifer S. Gontram & Gary W. Ritter, 2026. "Exploring Claims of Critical Race Theory, Divisive Topics, and Indoctrination in the Classroom," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 21(2), pages 390-403, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:390-403
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp.a.423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp.a.423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:390-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.