Author
Listed:
- Dan Goldhaber
(American Institutes for Research and Center for Education Data and Research University of Washington Seattle, WA 98103)
- Cyrus Grout
(Center for Education Data and Research University of Washington Seattle, WA 98103)
Abstract
Teacher hiring plays an important role in determining the composition of the teacher workforce and a small but growing body of research has sought to better understand the degree to which various types of applicant information predict teacher outcomes. We add to this literature by examining the relationship between structured ratings of applicants collected from their professional references and teacher retention, an outcome that has implications for student achievement as well as school and district recruitment and onboarding costs. We find that teachers who scored one standard deviation above average in their reference ratings were 2.6 percentage points more likely to remain at the schools that hired them. When we include rater-fixed effects in the model (so comparisons are between teacher applicants within rater), we find reference ratings are substantially more predictive of retention (including district- and state-level retention), suggesting that attention to issues of interrater reliability could make applicant ratings more useful. The results of this study support the idea that surveying professional references to get assessments of teacher applicants is a promising and low-cost approach to assessing job candidates that can complement other screening practices.
Suggested Citation
Dan Goldhaber & Cyrus Grout, 2026.
"How Predictive of Teacher Retention Are Ratings of Applicants from Professional References?,"
Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 21(2), pages 261-284, Spring.
Handle:
RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:261-284
DOI: 10.1162/edfp.a.32
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:261-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.