IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v21y2026i2p204-236.html

Financial Aid Package Composition and Postsecondary Outcomes for Low-income Students: Evidence from the Spartan Advantage Program

Author

Listed:
  • Seth Walker

    (Department of Economics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of substituting loans with need-based gift aid on postsecondary outcomes for low-income students. Using a regression discontinuity design based on the income eligibility threshold for Michigan State University's Spartan Advantage Program (SPAD), I estimate how altering the composition of a financial aid package—specifically, replacing loans with gift aid—affects college outcomes for students just below the federal poverty line. While the change in aid composition did not affect persistence or graduation rates, it did influence students' major choices. SPAD recipients were less likely than nonrecipients to remain in STEM fields between their admissions application—submitted before receiving their financial aid package—and graduation. Further, they were more likely to move toward majors that better reflected their academic preparation, indicating improved fit between students and their field of study. These findings suggest that changes in aid composition can meaningfully shape academic choices, even in the absence of effects on persistence or degree completion.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth Walker, 2026. "Financial Aid Package Composition and Postsecondary Outcomes for Low-income Students: Evidence from the Spartan Advantage Program," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 21(2), pages 204-236, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:204-236
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp.a.27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.27
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp.a.27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:204-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.