IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v21y2026i1p1-23.html

Can Public Investment in Community Colleges Draw Adult Learners Away from For-Profits?

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie McGuinness

    (Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306)

Abstract

Leveraging a historically large investment in workforce credentialing programs at public community colleges, I test whether funding awarded to half of U.S. community colleges led to increased enrollment and substitution away from for-profit colleges. I use Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) data to observe the revealed college preferences of students at open-access institutions. I find that a fifth of all for-profit college enrollees filed a FAFSA to a community college. Grant funding of $3–5 million per institution caused community colleges to capture enrollments from the for-profit sector, as evidenced by a 5 percent reduction in the probability that community college applicants also apply to a for-profit college, and a 5 percent trade-off in favor of community college enrollment among applicants who continue to apply to both sectors. Results provide evidence that federal investment in community colleges increases community college market power and selection away from competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie McGuinness, 2026. "Can Public Investment in Community Colleges Draw Adult Learners Away from For-Profits?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-23, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp.a.21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.21
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp.a.21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.