IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v20y2025i4p562-583.html

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Corequisite English Developmental Education: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Texas Community Colleges

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Cunha

    (Department of Defense Management Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943)

  • Trey Miller

    (School of Economic Political and Policy Science University of Texas at Dallas American Institutes for Research Richardson, TX 75080)

  • Megan Austin

    (Education Systems and Policy American Institutes for Research Arlington, VA 22202-3289)

  • Lindsay Daugherty

    (RAND Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138)

  • Paco Martorell

    (School of Education University of California at Davis Davis, CA 95616)

Abstract

We estimate the cost effectiveness of corequisite English developmental education at community colleges compared with a traditional prerequisite pathway. Our context is a previously published randomized controlled trial that estimated the effects of three different approaches to English corequisites implemented in five Texas community colleges. The main drivers of differential costs across pathways and colleges are the number of credit and contact hours in each pathway, class sizes, and the type of faculty used to teach courses (adjunct or full-time). Corequisites are less expensive than prerequisite pathways in two colleges, they are roughly similar in two other colleges, and they are much more expensive in one college. Miller et al. ( 2022 ) find that corequisites induced more students to pass the required college-level English course in all colleges but find no impact on persistence in college. From students’ point of view, corequisites should be preferred because tuition payments are lower, and they entail a higher likelihood of success.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Cunha & Trey Miller & Megan Austin & Lindsay Daugherty & Paco Martorell, 2025. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Corequisite English Developmental Education: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Texas Community Colleges," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 562-583, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:562-583
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00443
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:562-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.