IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v20y2025i4p534-561.html

Does Corequisite Remediation Work for Everyone? An Exploration of Heterogeneous Effects and Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Xiaotao Ran

    (School of Education University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716)

  • Hojung Lee

    (School of Education Joseph R. Biden Jr. School of Public Policy & Administration University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716)

Abstract

The landscape of developmental education has experienced significant shifts over the last decade nationwide, as more than twenty states and higher education systems have transitioned from the traditional prerequisite model to corequisite remediation. Drawing on administrative data from Tennessee community colleges from 2010 to 2020, we examined the heterogeneous effects of corequisite reform for remediation-eligible students with varying levels of academic preparation. Using difference-in-differences and event study designs, we found that corequisite remediation significantly improved gateway and subsequent college-level course completion for students in all placement test score groups below the college-level threshold. For math, the positive effects on college-level course completion were stronger for higher-scoring remedial students than for those with lower placement test scores, whereas the pattern was reversed for English. However, since the corequisite reform, students requiring remediation were more likely to drop out of the public college system, and those with the lowest scores were less likely to earn short-term certificates.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Xiaotao Ran & Hojung Lee, 2025. "Does Corequisite Remediation Work for Everyone? An Exploration of Heterogeneous Effects and Mechanisms," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 534-561, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:534-561
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:534-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.