IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v20y2025i3p457-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Online Testing Make the Grade? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Atwater

    (Department of Economics University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611)

  • Mark Rush

    (Department of Economics University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611)

  • Perihan Saygin

    (Department of Applied Economics Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Abstract

As a result of the increase in online course offerings at colleges and universities, the prevalence of online and computerized examinations has increased over the last two decades. Beyond academia, online examinations have been used to assess competence for certifications by both governments and private firms. Despite this importance, a randomized controlled trial that randomizes individual test takers into online and in-person examinations has not previously been conducted. In this paper, we rectify this by conducting this experiment in a large economics class at a large research university in the American southeast. We supplement our experiment results with a novel methodology of using screening surveys administered to potential volunteers which solicit preference information. We find that online testing reduces examination grades by over a tenth of a standard deviation, relative to in-person assessment. Additional exploratory exercises provide evidence that this effect is driven by students who prefer in-person examinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Atwater & Mark Rush & Perihan Saygin, 2025. "Does Online Testing Make the Grade? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(3), pages 457-472, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:457-472
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00432
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:457-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.