Author
Listed:
- Naureen Karachiwalla
(International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Washington, DC 20005)
- Katrina Kosec
(International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Washington, DC 20005)
- Saher Asad
(World Bank Washington DC 20433)
- Masooma Habib
(Consortium for Development Policy Research (CDPR) Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan)
- Clare Leaver
(Blavatnik School of Government University of Oxford Oxford, United Kingdom)
- Attique ur Rehman
(University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716)
Abstract
Partnering with governments to co-design pilot interventions and embed them in local bureaucratic systems is increasingly seen as “best practice” on grounds of scalability and sustainability. This paper reports on a pilot program that was co-designed with, and embedded within, the Elementary and Secondary Education Department in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province that offers a cautionary tale. The over-arching desire to work within existing bureaucratic systems, while laudable, constrained the design of the randomized controlled trial. This paper presents findings on some of the institutional factors which resulted in failed implementation of the randomized controlled trial and a lost opportunity to learn about the efficacy of key design features. The paper briefly outlines the design of the pilot—promotion-based incentives for educators—and summarizes the largely null results. It then turns to implementation, discussing what went wrong, how this was uncovered, and lessons learned for co-designing and embedding future pilot studies with(in) government.
Suggested Citation
Naureen Karachiwalla & Katrina Kosec & Saher Asad & Masooma Habib & Clare Leaver & Attique ur Rehman, 2025.
"Designing and Implementing Experiments within Local Bureaucratic Systems: A Cautionary Tale from an Educator Incentive Program,"
Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(3), pages 433-456, Summer.
Handle:
RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:433-456
DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00435
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:433-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.