IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v19y2024i1p169-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Funding High-poverty School Districts: Federal Policy Tools and the Limits of Incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Gordon

    (McCourt School of Public Policy Georgetown University, and National Bureau of Economic Research Washington, DC 20057)

  • Sarah Reber

    (The Brookings Institution, and National Bureau of Economic Research Washington, DC 20036)

Abstract

What can the federal government do to help ensure that the public schools attended by children living in poverty have enough resources to serve their students? In this brief, we describe existing federal efforts to support education spending in high-poverty districts, discuss their limitations, and suggest alternative approaches for federal policy. We focus especially on the Education Finance Incentive Grant (EFIG) formula—a part of the compensatory Title I grant program designed to encourage changes to state school finance policy—and show that the incentives embedded in the formula are in fact negligible; revising the formula to be more effective would be difficult. Further, any attempt to incentivize desirable state policy faces a fundamental trade-off: Such policy can reinforce inequality because districts in states that do not respond to the incentives by adopting desirable policies also do not receive (as much) federal funding. We argue that federal policy should be more attentive to state fiscal capacity because it is an important determinant of district-level school spending, and the federal government is uniquely positioned to address between-state inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Gordon & Sarah Reber, 2024. "Funding High-poverty School Districts: Federal Policy Tools and the Limits of Incentives," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 19(1), pages 169-181, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:169-181
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00408
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:169-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.