IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Multilateral Trade Negotiations in the GATT and the WTO: Lessons for Asia

Listed author(s):
  • K. C. Fung

    (Santa Cruz Center for International Economics (SCCIE) University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA, and Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy (HKIEBS) University of Hong Kong Pofulam Road Hong Kong SAR China)

  • Hitomi Iizaka

    (Department of Economics University of California, Santa Cruz Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA and School of Economics and Finance University of Hong Kong Pofulam Road Hong Kong SAR China)

  • Chelsea Lin

    (Department of Economics National Dong Hwa University Hwalin Taiwan)

  • Francis Ng

    (Trade Policy Research The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20433 USA)

This paper aims to help Asian trade negotiators by examining the processes and results of the Uruguay Round. Analysts argue that trade negotiations are based on mercantilistic rules. But the actual outcome of the Uruguay Round suggests that trade bargaining was not based on strict reciprocity. In terms of tariff reductions, Asian economies received more than they gave, but relative to tariff bindings, Asian economies gave more than they received. Asian economies that undertook trade reforms prior to the trade talks did not lose bargaining power. The paper also presents econometric evidence on the determinants of bargaining power of nations. Copyright (c) 2005 The Earth Institute at Columbia University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by MIT Press in its journal Asian Economic Papers.

Volume (Year): 3 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 79-96

in new window

Handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:3:y:2004:i:2:p:79-96
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:3:y:2004:i:2:p:79-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristin Waites)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.