IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v41y2023i1p44-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) for Dangerous Goods Courses in Air Transportation Management Department

Author

Listed:
  • Wiwid Suryono

    (Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya.)

  • Bambang Bagus Harianto

    (Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya.)

Abstract

Analysis of question items is an assessment of the questions that are evaluated to measure quality. Analysis of question items has two ways, namely quantitative and qualitative question item analysis. The goal to be achieved is to find out the quality of the multiple-choice form of Final Semester Exam questions and also to detect sound and wrong questions. The method used in this study is the quantitative descriptive method. Data collection uses documentation, interviews, and observations. The Excel program uses data analysis to detect the quality of good and bad questions. The results of the quantitative analysis of the reliability of multiple-choice questions of 0.76 mean reliable questions. Difficulty index: 3 medium questions (6%), 47 easy questions (76%), and 9 very easy questions (18%). Discrimination index: 8 questions are very low (16%), 22 questions are low (44%), 9 questions are medium (18%), and t10 questions are high (20%). Distractor efficiency: 125 items of malfunctioning questions (83.33%) and 25 items of functioning questions (16.67%).

Suggested Citation

  • Wiwid Suryono & Bambang Bagus Harianto, 2023. "Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) for Dangerous Goods Courses in Air Transportation Management Department," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 41(1), pages 44-57, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:44-57
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v41i1.8512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8512/3127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8512
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v41i1.8512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Alsoufi & Ali Alsuyihili & Ahmed Msherghi & Ahmed Elhadi & Hana Atiyah & Aimen Ashini & Arwa Ashwieb & Mohamed Ghula & Hayat Ben Hasan & Salsabil Abudabuos & Hind Alameen & Taqwa Abokhdhir & Moh, 2020. "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: Medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kacper Nijakowski & Anna Lehmann & Jakub Zdrojewski & Monika Nowak & Anna Surdacka, 2021. "The Effectiveness of the Blended Learning in Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics on the Basis of the Survey among 4th-Year Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Piotr Przymuszała & Šucja Zielińska-Tomczak & Michał Kłos & Angelika Kowalska & Paulina Birula & Martyna Piszczek & Magdalena Cerbin-Koczorowska & Ryszard Marciniak, 2022. "Distance Learning and Assessment During the COVID-19 Pandemic—Perspectives of Polish Medical and Healthcare Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    3. Ioana Silistraru & Oana Olariu & Anamaria Ciubara & Ștefan Roșca & Ramona Oana Roșca & Silviu Stanciu & Alina Plesea Condratovici & Ioan-Adrian Ciureanu, 2022. "Burnout and Online Medical Education: Romanian Students in Lockdown and Their Residency Choices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Jun Xin Lee & Ahmad Hathim Ahmad Azman & Jing Yi Ng & Noor Akmal Shareela Ismail, 2022. "Deciphering Learning Motivation in Open Distance Learning towards Sustainable Medical Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Heiko Sorg & Jan P. Ehlers & Christian G. G. Sorg, 2022. "Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Alvaro Prados-Carmona & Francisco Fuentes-Jimenez & Rafael Roman de los Reyes & Antonio García-Rios & Jesus Rioja-Bravo & Ezequiel Herruzo-Gomez & Pablo Perez-Martinez & Jose Lopez-Miranda & Javier De, 2022. "A Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Developing and Implementing a Mobile App for the Acquisition of Clinical Knowledge and Competencies by Medical Students Transitioning from Preclinical to Clinical Y," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Ahmad A. Shahba & Zaid Alashban & Ibrahim Sales & Abdelrahman Y. Sherif & Osman Yusuf, 2022. "Development and Evaluation of Interactive Flipped e-Learning (iFEEL) for Pharmacy Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Tzyy-Yurn Tzeng & Chia-An Hsu & Ying-Ying Yang & Eunice J. Yuan & Ya-Ting Chang & Tzu-Hao Li & Chung-Pin Li & Jen-Feng Liang & Jiing-Feng Lirng & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Chia-Chang Huang & Ming-Chih Hou & Che, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Learning Outcomes of Medical Students in Taiwan: A Two-Year Prospective Cohort Study of OSCE Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Carmen Concerto & Alessandro Rodolico & Valentina Lucia La Rosa & Barbara Aiello & Miriam Martinez & Sebastiano Stuto & Carmenrita Infortuna & Laura Fusar-Poli & Maria Salvina Signorelli & Elena Commo, 2022. "Flourishing or Languishing? Predictors of Positive Mental Health in Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Aleksandra Kobicheva & Elena Tokareva & Tatiana Baranova, 2022. "Students’ Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Performance in the Blended Environment at University: Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:44-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.