IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v119y2026i4p401-412.html

Individual versus collaborative learning: Impact of gamification on achievement and student engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Öznur Akgül
  • Mustafa Güler

Abstract

Contemporary approaches to mathematics instruction emphasize the role of collaborative learning in improving student achievement. While gamification has been widely studied, research on its effects in collaborative settings remains limited, and the effectiveness of different learning environments is still unclear. This study examines the impact of individual and collaborative gamified learning environments on students’ mathematics achievement and classroom engagement. Using a quasi-experimental design, 90 middle school students were divided into three groups: an individual gamification group, a collaborative gamification group, and a control group using a non-gamified method. Both gamified groups incorporated game elements like points, badges, and progress tracking to enhance motivation. The findings indicate that gamification improves academic performance in mathematics, though no significant differences were found between the individual and collaborative groups. However, classroom engagement was significantly higher in the individually gamified setting. These results suggest that while gamification enhances learning, its impact on engagement depends on the learning structure. The study concludes by discussing educational implications and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Öznur Akgül & Mustafa Güler, 2026. "Individual versus collaborative learning: Impact of gamification on achievement and student engagement," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(4), pages 401-412, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:4:p:401-412
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2025.2548576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2025.2548576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2025.2548576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:4:p:401-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.