IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v119y2026i2p153-173.html

Comparing Hong Kong secondary school students’ perceptions of ChatGPT-assisted EFL writing

Author

Listed:
  • David James Woo
  • Deliang Wang
  • Kai Guo

Abstract

This quantitative study investigates ChatGPT for English as a foreign language (EFL) writing, exploring 107 Hong Kong secondary school students’ perceptions. It compares three teaching approaches—process-based, genre-based, and prompt engineering only (no explicit writing approach)—assessing their impact on motivation, cognitive load, and satisfaction across academic achievement levels. The results show explicit writing approaches significantly enhanced motivation and reduced cognitive load compared to prompt engineering alone. Genre-based instruction proved superior to process-based, leading to significantly higher motivation and satisfaction, alongside lower cognitive load. Students from higher-achieving schools within explicit writing instruction groups demonstrated greater motivational improvements, lower cognitive load and higher satisfaction. From a cognitive load theory perspective, the structured schemas inherent in a genre-based approach effectively reduce cognitive burden, particularly benefiting students with stronger language proficiency. The study highlights the need for differentiated instruction, with genre-based approaches showing particular promise for ChatGPT-assisted EFL writing, especially when carefully scaffolded to support diverse learners.

Suggested Citation

  • David James Woo & Deliang Wang & Kai Guo, 2026. "Comparing Hong Kong secondary school students’ perceptions of ChatGPT-assisted EFL writing," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(2), pages 153-173, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:2:p:153-173
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2025.2525243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2025.2525243
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2025.2525243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:2:p:153-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.