IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v119y2026i1p64-76.html

Reading strategy use of upper primary school students in a task-oriented context

Author

Listed:
  • Nele Bleukx
  • Marieke Vanbuel
  • Hilde Van Keer
  • Katrijn Denies
  • Koen Aesaert

Abstract

This study explores the reading strategy use of low- and high-achieving upper primary school readers (N = 24) through the analysis of think-aloud protocols. Given the situational dependency of reading strategy use, one specific context was explored, namely a task-oriented reading context involving text-related questions. By employing direct observations, this study avoids the limitations associated with self-reports, which are most common in the current literature base. Overall, a limited use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies was observed. Small disparities in cognitive reading strategy use between low- and high-achieving readers were observed, while large differences emerged in the use of metacognitive reading strategies and task-related activities. High-achieving readers demonstrated more metacognition, reread the text more frequently for relevant information, and located this information more efficiently than low-achieving readers. Self-assessment was rarely observed and was only conducted by high achievers when evaluating answers to text-related questions. Implications for teachers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nele Bleukx & Marieke Vanbuel & Hilde Van Keer & Katrijn Denies & Koen Aesaert, 2026. "Reading strategy use of upper primary school students in a task-oriented context," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(1), pages 64-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:1:p:64-76
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2025.2515910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2025.2515910
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2025.2515910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:119:y:2026:i:1:p:64-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.