IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v118y2025i6p716-723.html

Utilization of AI-aided vocabulary teaching in K-12: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Gürkan Temiz
  • Elif Nazlı Kafadar

Abstract

The innovative teaching of English as a foreign language (EFL) is rapidly being and will probably continue to be driven by the extensive incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in English language teaching (ELT). AI applications and AI-powered educational materials have the potential to enrich teaching and learning practices by taking up various roles, and vocabulary is one of them (Kessler, 2018). Considering this, this experimental research aims to evaluate the effect of an artificial intelligence tool (DALL-E) on the English vocabulary learning of first-grade primary school students. DALL-E produces visual outputs in line with the provided detailed commands. In that sense, the main focus of this research is to examine and compare the possible impact of using AI-powered vocabulary learning cards against the traditional use of word cards in vocabulary teaching to young learners. This research covers a ten-week implementation, which lasted four weeks in the 2023 fall term and six in the following term, and evaluates the differences between students’ pretest and post-test scores in both the experimental and control groups that involved twenty students in each. The data were also strengthened with a delayed post-test conducted two weeks after the implementation. While the weekly word cards presented to the students in the experimental group were designed with the aid of the DALL-E artificial intelligence-supported Microsoft Design Creative AI program, traditional word cards, which are paper flashcards that lack color and object-related details, were employed in the control group. Regarding data analysis, tallying correct answers in percentage was performed in the first term, while Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests were run on SPSS in the second term to detect within- and across-group differences between the groups. The results of this study showed a statistical significance in the post-tests of the groups. While the experimental group performed better in the posttest during the first and second phases, there was no significant change in the delayed test, while the control group did the opposite and performed better with traditional flashcards. The study provided implications for educators, teachers, and relevant stakeholders to evaluate the possible ways of integrating AI-powered tools in vocabulary learning of K-12 students in English.

Suggested Citation

  • Gürkan Temiz & Elif Nazlı Kafadar, 2025. "Utilization of AI-aided vocabulary teaching in K-12: A case study," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(6), pages 716-723, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:6:p:716-723
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2025.2510400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2025.2510400
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2025.2510400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:6:p:716-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.