IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v114y2021i6p513-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the potential of STEAM education: How exemplary teachers navigate assessment challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Dubek
  • Christopher DeLuca
  • Nathan Rickey

Abstract

While integrated STEAM education has been shown to support the cultivation of critical global competencies, teachers have identified classroom assessment as a key barrier to facilitating integrated learning. This research investigated how exemplary teachers navigated classroom assessment challenges and practices within integrated STEAM education contexts. Employing an in-depth qualitative design, this study drew on data from interviews with 14 exemplary STEAM teachers and assessment artifacts (e.g., assessments, resources, lesson/unit plans). Through an inductive analysis, synergies and tensions within three overarching themes were identified: planning for assessment, formative assessment, and grading/evaluation. Teachers’ planning practice was characterized by a focus on key learning skills as well as divergent opinions regarding a backwards design approach. Central to teachers’ STEAM education practice, formative assessment was used to drive the iterative design cycle. When grading, teachers relied on their professional judgment and supported student self-advocacy. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Dubek & Christopher DeLuca & Nathan Rickey, 2021. "Unlocking the potential of STEAM education: How exemplary teachers navigate assessment challenges," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(6), pages 513-525, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:114:y:2021:i:6:p:513-525
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:114:y:2021:i:6:p:513-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.