IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v114y2021i3p278-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplemental intervention improves writing of first-grade students: Single case experimental design evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Meaghan McKenna
  • Howard Goldstein
  • Xigrid Soto-Boykin
  • Ke Cheng
  • Gary A. Troia
  • John Ferron

Abstract

The limited research available on writing in Grade 1 led to the development and implementation of an intervention for students who were performing below expectations. Ten students participated in a writing intervention for 11–13 weeks. A multiple baseline design across three units of instruction was focused on (a) paragraph structure, (b) sentence structure and handwriting, and (c) vocabulary and spelling allowed for analysis of the effects of the intervention. Treatment effects were evident from visual analysis, nonoverlap statistics, and multilevel modeling. Descriptive data collected on literacy measures administered before and after the intervention also indicated growth. Educator ratings of student writing and social validity surveys provide further evidence that improvements in student writing were apparent. Students also provided favorable input. These results indicate the malleability of writing behavior in at-risk first-grade students. Although preliminary findings are promising, iterative development would help improve this intervention and determine its efficacy with a broader sample of students.

Suggested Citation

  • Meaghan McKenna & Howard Goldstein & Xigrid Soto-Boykin & Ke Cheng & Gary A. Troia & John Ferron, 2021. "Supplemental intervention improves writing of first-grade students: Single case experimental design evaluation," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(3), pages 278-293, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:114:y:2021:i:3:p:278-293
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2021.1923450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2021.1923450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2021.1923450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:114:y:2021:i:3:p:278-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.