IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v111y2018i6p690-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of a strategy training on reading comprehension in fourth-grade students

Author

Listed:
  • Marloes Muijselaar
  • Nicole Swart
  • Esther Steenbeek-Planting
  • Mienke Droop
  • Ludo Verhoeven
  • Peter de Jong

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that instruction of reading strategies is an effective method for enhancing reading comprehension. However, many of the interventions in these studies focused on small groups of (poor) comprehenders and were provided by research assistants, making it time-consuming and relatively expensive. The authors implemented a strategy intervention to intact classrooms, consisting of reciprocal teaching and delivered by teachers. Participants were 510 typically developing fourth-grade students. A clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted with pretest, posttest, and follow-up measures to assess knowledge of reading strategies and reading comprehension. The results revealed that the intervention had an effect on knowledge of reading strategies at posttest and follow-up. However, the intervention did not affect reading comprehension performance. Together with the results of earlier studies, the present study raises the question whether strategy interventions are the most efficient to improve fourth-grade students' reading comprehension.

Suggested Citation

  • Marloes Muijselaar & Nicole Swart & Esther Steenbeek-Planting & Mienke Droop & Ludo Verhoeven & Peter de Jong, 2018. "The effect of a strategy training on reading comprehension in fourth-grade students," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(6), pages 690-703, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:111:y:2018:i:6:p:690-703
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2017.1396439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2017.1396439
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2017.1396439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:111:y:2018:i:6:p:690-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.