IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v110y2017i1p98-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining a motivational treatment and its impact on adolescents' reading comprehension and fluency

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher A. Wolters
  • Marcia A. Barnes
  • Paulina A. Kulesz
  • Mary York
  • David J. Francis

Abstract

The authors' purpose was to examine adolescents' reading motivation in relation to standardized assessments of reading comprehension and fluency. After a reading pretest, 60 ninth-grade students (M age = 14.9 years) were randomly assigned to two groups. Compared to those in the control condition, those administered brief oral feedback intended to improve motivation indicated an increased focus on mastery goals and greater perceived control during a reading posttest. No differences were found with regard to four other aspects of motivation. Students in the treatment condition, including struggling readers more specifically, did not score better on the posttest measures of reading comprehension or fluency. Hence, results failed to replicate Zentall and Lee's (2012) findings with younger readers. Findings are discussed with regard to the theoretical and practical implications for understanding reading motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher A. Wolters & Marcia A. Barnes & Paulina A. Kulesz & Mary York & David J. Francis, 2017. "Examining a motivational treatment and its impact on adolescents' reading comprehension and fluency," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(1), pages 98-109, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:110:y:2017:i:1:p:98-109
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2015.1048503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2015.1048503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2015.1048503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:110:y:2017:i:1:p:98-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.