IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v109y2016i2p111-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying questioning or reading strategy to review technology enhanced coedited notes of elementary school students

Author

Listed:
  • Chiung-Hui Chiu
  • Hsiao-Wei Cheng
  • Chiu-Yi Wu

Abstract

The authors examined whether applying questioning review better enhances elementary level students' learning from technology-enhanced coediting-based note taking than does traditional reading review. A nonequivalent comparison group quasi-experimental design was implemented and replicated on four independent units. Two sixth grade elementary classes (66 students) participated in this study and were arranged into coediting notes with questioning review and coediting notes with reading review conditions respectively. The comparisons of student notes and achievement tests do not reveal that the questioning review group achieves better performance than does the reading review group. Considerations associated with technology enhanced coediting notes and questions are discussed based on the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiung-Hui Chiu & Hsiao-Wei Cheng & Chiu-Yi Wu, 2016. "Applying questioning or reading strategy to review technology enhanced coedited notes of elementary school students," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(2), pages 111-121, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:109:y:2016:i:2:p:111-121
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2014.924471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2014.924471
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2014.924471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:109:y:2016:i:2:p:111-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.