IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v6y2010i3p47-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Information Privacy Concerns with Employer Held Data: A Comparison of Two Prevalent Privacy Models

Author

Listed:
  • Clouse Shawn F.
  • Wright Ryan T.
  • Pike Ronald E.

Abstract

The privacy stream of research has been studied considerably over the past 20 years. This included applying privacy questions to different online contexts such as health care, ecommerce, and government. The purpose of this article is to empirically compare and evaluate two prevalent privacy models; Concern for Information Privacy (CFIP) and Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC) within the organizational context of employment. By doing so, this research: I) evaluates the two privacy models to see which best predicts behavioral intention within an employee/employer relationship, and, 2) prescribes to organizations how individuals view the privacy of their information held by employers. This research extends the literature by validating IS privacy models in this new domain and provides valuable information to managers of information systems resources for organizations. Using a seeded sample of 457 employed individuals ranging in age from 18 to 71, the authors conclude that IUIPC is substantially superior for predicting behavioral intentions regarding employment privacy concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Clouse Shawn F. & Wright Ryan T. & Pike Ronald E., 2010. "Employee Information Privacy Concerns with Employer Held Data: A Comparison of Two Prevalent Privacy Models," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 47-71, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:47-71
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2010.10855893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2010.10855893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2010.10855893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Yeolib & Kim, Seung Hyun & Peterson, Robert A. & Choi, Jeonghye, 2023. "Privacy concern and its consequences: A meta-analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:6:y:2010:i:3:p:47-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.